You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and psychometric testing of the clinical leadership needs analysis (CLeeNA) instrument for nurses and midwives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nursing Management, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jonm.12672 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vera J. C. Mc Carthy, Ashling Murphy, Eileen Savage, Josephine Hegarty, Alice Coffey, Patricia Leahy‐Warren, Aine Horgan, Rhona O'Connell, Lynne Marsh, Jonathan Drennan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nursing Management
#810
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,740
of 345,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nursing Management
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.