↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up
Published in
European Spine Journal, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00586-011-2145-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Hellum, Lars Gunnar Johnsen, Øyvind Gjertsen, Linda Berg, Gesche Neckelmann, Oliver Grundnes, Ivar Rossvoll, Jan Sture Skouen, Jens Ivar Brox, Kjersti Storheim, The Norwegian Spine Study Group

Abstract

A prospective study to evaluate whether certain baseline characteristics can predict outcome in patients treated with disc prosthesis or multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,412,246
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#998
of 4,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,608
of 243,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,594 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.