↓ Skip to main content

Normal kinematics of the upper cervical spine during the Flexion–Rotation Test – In vivo measurements using magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Normal kinematics of the upper cervical spine during the Flexion–Rotation Test – In vivo measurements using magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, November 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2010.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Takasaki, Toby Hall, Sadanori Oshiro, Shouta Kaneko, Yoshikazu Ikemoto, Gwendolen Jull

Abstract

The Flexion-Rotation Test (FRT) is proposed to assess mobility primarily at C1-C2. However, there is no in vivo measurement investigating the validity of the FRT. The purpose of this study was 1) to examine measurement reliability of segmental upper cervical movements using magnetic resonance imaging and 2) to investigate the content validity of the FRT. Nineteen asymptomatic female subjects (mean age: 22.2 years) were evaluated with a 0.2-T horizontally open MRI unit. The segmental rotation angles from Occiput-C1 to C3-C4 and the C4 vertebra were assessed with the head maximally rotated to both the right and the left in two conditions - neck in neutral and in flexion. Good reliability of the method of measurement was suggested by error considerations. A repeated measure ANOVA revealed an interaction between the two different neck starting positions and segment levels (P < 0.0001). Post-hoc analysis revealed that there were significant reductions in the flexed position (P < 0.0001) except for at Occiput-C1. While there was only a 16.3% reduction in rotation range at C1-C2, the reduction was 68.1% at C2-C3, 61.4% at C3-C4, and 76.9% at segments below C4, respectively, supporting the content validity of the FRT as a clinical measure of atlanto-axial mobility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 202 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 25%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 14 7%
Other 50 24%
Unknown 33 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 17%
Engineering 12 6%
Sports and Recreations 10 5%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 43 20%