| Title |
A lower impact of an acute exposure to electronic cigarette aerosols than to cigarette smoke in human organotypic buccal and small airway cultures was demonstrated using systems toxicology assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Internal and Emergency Medicine, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11739-019-02055-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita R. Iskandar, Filippo Zanetti, Athanasios Kondylis, Florian Martin, Patrice Leroy, Shoaib Majeed, Sandro Steiner, Yang Xiang, Laura Ortega Torres, Keyur Trivedi, Emmanuel Guedj, Celine Merg, Stefan Frentzel, Nikolai V. Ivanov, Utkarsh Doshi, Kyeonghee Monica Lee, Willie J. McKinney, Manuel C. Peitsch, Julia Hoeng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Hungary | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 18% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,572,456
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#232
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,384
of 352,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.