| Title |
Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Adults: the Use of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Module 4
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-010-1157-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jojanneke A. Bastiaansen, Harma Meffert, Simone Hein, Petra Huizinga, Cees Ketelaars, Marieke Pijnenborg, Arnold Bartels, Ruud Minderaa, Christian Keysers, Annelies de Bildt |
| Abstract |
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) module 4 was investigated in an independent sample of high-functioning adult males with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to three specific diagnostic groups: schizophrenia, psychopathy, and typical development. ADOS module 4 proves to be a reliable instrument with good predictive value. It can adequately discriminate ASD from psychopathy and typical development, but is less specific with respect to schizophrenia due to behavioral overlap between autistic and negative symptoms. However, these groups differ on some core items and explorative analyses indicate that a revision of the algorithm in line with Gotham et al. (J Autism Dev Disord 37: 613-627, 2007) could be beneficial for discriminating ASD from schizophrenia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Israel | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 274 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
| Researcher | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 61 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 120 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,521,227
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#634
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,083
of 186,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.