| Title |
Comparison of 3D endoscopy and conventional 2D endoscopy in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: an ex vivo animal study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-019-06726-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kosuke Nomura, Daisuke Kikuchi, Mitsuru Kaise, Toshiro Iizuka, Yorinari Ochiai, Yugo Suzuki, Yumiko Fukuma, Masami Tanaka, Yosuke Okamoto, Satoshi Yamashita, Akira Matsui, Toshifumi Mitani, Shu Hoteya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 23% |
| Engineering | 7 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,035,755
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,616
of 6,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,424
of 352,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#72
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.