| Title |
Pathology of mesothelioma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12199-007-0017-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kouki Inai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,250,879
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#110
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,012
of 80,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.