↓ Skip to main content

Wild hummingbirds rely on landmarks not geometry when learning an array of flowers

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Wild hummingbirds rely on landmarks not geometry when learning an array of flowers
Published in
Animal Cognition, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10071-014-0748-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Andrew Hurly, Thomas A. O. Fox, Danielle M. Zwueste, Susan D. Healy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 47%
Psychology 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#972
of 1,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,370
of 226,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.