You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structured Decision-Making and Rapid Prototyping to Plan a Management Response to an Invasive Species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3996/jfwm-025 |
| Authors |
Sean M. Blomquist, Trisha D. Johnson, David R. Smith, Geoff P. Call, Brant N. Miller, W. Mark Thurman, Jamie E. McFadden, Mary J. Parkin, G. Scott Boomer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 91 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#168
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,261
of 104,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.