| Title |
Permissive versus restrictive temperature thresholds in critically ill children with fever and infection: a multicentre randomized clinical pilot trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2354-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark J. Peters, Kerry Woolfall, Imran Khan, Elisabeth Deja, Paul R. Mouncey, Jerome Wulff, Alexina Mason, Rachel S. Agbeko, Elizabeth S. Draper, Blaise Fenn, Doug W. Gould, Abby Koelewyn, Nigel Klein, Christine Mackerness, Sian Martin, Lauran O’Neill, Samiran Ray, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan, Shane Tibby, Kentigern Thorburn, Lyvonne Tume, Jason Watkins, Paul Wellman, David A. Harrison, Kathryn M. Rowan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 30% |
| United States | 9 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 24% |
| Scientists | 15 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#994,439
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#768
of 6,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,038
of 369,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#22
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.