↓ Skip to main content

Review of Conrad, D.,

Overview of attention for article published in TechTrends, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Review of Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment Strategies for Online Learning: Engagement and Authenticity. Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press
Published in
TechTrends, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11528-019-00380-8
Authors

David J. Mulder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 29%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 24%
Psychology 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Linguistics 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,569,152
of 24,447,003 outputs
Outputs from TechTrends
#446
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,237
of 358,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TechTrends
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,447,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.