↓ Skip to main content

The case for scenario-based assessment of written argumentation

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
The case for scenario-based assessment of written argumentation
Published in
Reading and Writing, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11145-018-9852-7
Authors

Paul Deane, Yi Song, Peter van Rijn, Tenaha O’Reilly, Mary Fowles, Randy Bennett, John Sabatini, Mo Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 7%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 31 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 24%
Arts and Humanities 8 11%
Linguistics 8 11%
Psychology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 31 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,939,705
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#246
of 810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,847
of 332,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.