↓ Skip to main content

Bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orang utans use feature and spatial cues in two spatial memory tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orang utans use feature and spatial cues in two spatial memory tasks
Published in
Animal Cognition, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10071-009-0291-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Kanngiesser, Josep Call

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Hungary 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 67 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 27%
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 43%
Psychology 23 31%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 7 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,359,595
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,225
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,525
of 93,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.