| Title |
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Crossover Studies Comparing Physiological, Perceptual and Performance Measures Between Treadmill and Overground Running
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-019-01087-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jayme R. Miller, Bas Van Hooren, Chris Bishop, Jonathan D. Buckley, Richard W. Willy, Joel T. Fuller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 11% |
| Spain | 14 | 10% |
| Australia | 8 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 5% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 107 | 74% |
| Scientists | 27 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 228 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 21% |
| Unknown | 65 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 70 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 87 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#197,422
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#183
of 2,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,262
of 366,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.