↓ Skip to main content

Immunogenicity and Safety of a Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine Administered as a First Dose to Children Aged 12 to 15 Months: A Phase III, Randomized, Noninferiority, Lot-to-Lot Consistency Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 1,013)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
96 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunogenicity and Safety of a Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine Administered as a First Dose to Children Aged 12 to 15 Months: A Phase III, Randomized, Noninferiority, Lot-to-Lot Consistency Study
Published in
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, March 2019
DOI 10.1093/jpids/piz010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola P Klein, Remon Abu-Elyazeed, Michael Povey, Mercedes Macias Parra, Javier Diez-Domingo, Anitta Ahonen, Tiina Korhonen, Juan-Carlos Tinoco, Leonard Weiner, Gary S Marshall, Peter E Silas, Kwabena O Sarpong, Keith P Ramsey, John A Fling, David Speicher, Maribel Campos, Iona Munjal, Christopher Peltier, Timo Vesikari, Carmen Baccarini, Adrian Caplanusi, Paul Gillard, Stephane Carryn, Ouzama Henry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 22 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 26 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2023.
All research outputs
#575,225
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
#43
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,259
of 365,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.