| Title |
Comparison of perceptions of unmet supportive care needs between cancer patients and their oncologists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-019-04705-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satish Chandrasekhar Nair, Waleed A. Hassen, Jayadevan Sreedharan, Khaled Qawasmeh, Halah Ibrahim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,038,216
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#317
of 4,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,005
of 352,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#14
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.