↓ Skip to main content

Hot topics in science communication: Aggressive language decreases trustworthiness and credibility in scientific debates

Overview of attention for article published in Public Understanding of Science, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 1,120)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
286 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hot topics in science communication: Aggressive language decreases trustworthiness and credibility in scientific debates
Published in
Public Understanding of Science, March 2019
DOI 10.1177/0963662519833903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars König, Regina Jucks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 286 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 46 32%
Psychology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Linguistics 4 3%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 46 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#210,259
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#14
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,557
of 367,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.