| Title |
Analytical applications of MIPs in diagnostic assays: future perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-015-9137-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas S. Bedwell, Michael J. Whitcombe |
| Abstract |
Many efforts have been made to produce artificial materials with biomimetic properties for applications in binding assays. Among these efforts, the technique of molecular imprinting has received much attention because of the high selectivity obtainable for molecules of interest, robustness of the produced polymers, simple and short synthesis, and excellent cost efficiency. In this review, progress in the field of molecularly imprinted sorbent assays is discussed-with a focus on work conducted from 2005 to date. Graphical Abstract A growing trend in recent years has been the use of molecularly imprinted polymers as replacements for antibodies in various assay formats, as indicated by a steady increase in publications in the area (see graph). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 46 | 34% |
| Engineering | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 53 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,397,545
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#838
of 9,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,824
of 393,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#11
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.