Title |
Mobile learning as alternative to assistive technology devices for special needs students
|
---|---|
Published in |
Education and Information Technologies, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10639-015-9462-9 |
Authors |
Jalal Ismaili, El Houcine Ouazzani Ibrahimi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 249 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
Lecturer | 19 | 8% |
Other | 46 | 18% |
Unknown | 75 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 49 | 19% |
Computer Science | 36 | 14% |
Arts and Humanities | 14 | 6% |
Psychology | 12 | 5% |
Engineering | 11 | 4% |
Other | 44 | 17% |
Unknown | 86 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Education and Information Technologies
#256
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,502
of 400,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Education and Information Technologies
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.