↓ Skip to main content

Gay-for-Pay: Straight Men and the Making of Gay Pornography

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Sociology, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Gay-for-Pay: Straight Men and the Making of Gay Pornography
Published in
Qualitative Sociology, December 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:quas.0000005056.46990.c0
Authors

Jeffrey Escoffier

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 9%
France 1 2%
Unknown 47 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 34%
Psychology 11 21%
Arts and Humanities 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Sociology
#182
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,083
of 142,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Sociology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.