↓ Skip to main content

The Whats, the Wheres and the Hows of strigolactone action in the roots

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
The Whats, the Wheres and the Hows of strigolactone action in the roots
Published in
Planta, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00425-016-2483-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cedrick Matthys, Alan Walton, Sylwia Struk, Elisabeth Stes, François-Didier Boyer, Kris Gevaert, Sofie Goormachtig

Abstract

Strigolactones control various aspects of plant development, including root architecture. Here, we review how strigolactones act in the root and survey the strigolactone specificity of signaling components that affect root development. Strigolactones are a group of secondary metabolites produced in plants that have been assigned multiple roles, of which the most recent is hormonal activity. Over the last decade, these compounds have been shown to regulate various aspects of plant development, such as shoot branching and leaf senescence, but a growing body of literature suggests that these hormones play an equally important role in the root. In this review, we present all known root phenotypes linked to strigolactones. We examine the expression and presence of the main players in biosynthesis and signaling of these hormones and bring together the available information that allows us to explain how strigolactones act to modulate the root system architecture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Chemistry 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,281,544
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#110
of 3,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,588
of 312,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.