You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Density-dependent growth in ‘catch-and-wait’ fisheries has implications for fisheries management and Marine Protected Areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-019-01158-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julian Merder, Patricia Browne, Jan A. Freund, Liam Fullbrook, Conor Graham, Mark P. Johnson, Alina Wieczorek, Anne Marie Power |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Ireland | 2 | 13% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,145,185
of 24,862,965 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#578
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,091
of 357,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.