| Title |
Topological spatial representation in wild chacma baboons (Papio ursinus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-019-01253-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Louise de Raad, Russell A. Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Israel | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 14 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,894,207
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#406
of 1,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,453
of 357,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.