| Title |
Where to place the rewards? Exploration bias in mice influences performance in the classic hole-board spatial memory test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-019-01256-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia Sampedro-Piquero, M. Carmen Mañas-Padilla, Fabiola Ávila-Gámiz, Sara Gil-Rodríguez, Luis J. Santín, Estela Castilla-Ortega |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chad | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Psychology | 3 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,326,750
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#917
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,264
of 366,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.