↓ Skip to main content

Quadriceps muscle function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systemic differences in neural and morphological characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Quadriceps muscle function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systemic differences in neural and morphological characteristics
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00221-019-05499-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam S. Lepley, Dustin R. Grooms, Julie P. Burland, Steven M. Davi, Jeffrey M. Kinsella-Shaw, Lindsey K. Lepley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 13 7%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 58 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 22%
Sports and Recreations 28 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 69 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,608,023
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#99
of 3,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,501
of 368,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.