↓ Skip to main content

Parental and clinician agreement of illness severity in children with RTIs: secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Parental and clinician agreement of illness severity in children with RTIs: secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x701837
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther T van der Werf, Niamh M Redmond, Sophie Turnbull, Hannah Thornton, Matthew Thompson, Paul Little, Tim J Peters, Peter S Blair, Alastair D Hay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 24%
Student > Master 8 22%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Psychology 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,176,176
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,054
of 4,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,753
of 356,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#42
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.