| Title |
Exploring public attitudes towards the new Faster Diagnosis Standard for cancer: a focus group study with the UK public
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x702677 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marianne Piano, Georgia Black, Dorothee Amelung, Emily Power, Katriina L Whitaker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 43% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#611,807
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#260
of 4,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,500
of 352,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#14
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.