| Title |
Biodiversity of methylotrophic microbial communities and their potential role in mitigation of abiotic stresses in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biologia, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2478/s11756-019-00190-6 |
| Authors |
Manish Kumar, Divjot Kour, Ajar Nath Yadav, Raghvendra Saxena, Pankaj Kumar Rai, Anurag Jyoti, Rajesh Singh Tomar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,227,398
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Biologia
#236
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,020
of 448,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.