↓ Skip to main content

Disorientating, fun or meaningful? Disadvantaged families’ experiences of a science museum visit

Overview of attention for article published in Cultural Studies of Science Education, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 549)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Disorientating, fun or meaningful? Disadvantaged families’ experiences of a science museum visit
Published in
Cultural Studies of Science Education, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11422-015-9667-7
Authors

Louise Archer, Emily Dawson, Amy Seakins, Billy Wong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 59 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 63 32%
Arts and Humanities 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 66 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,065,738
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Cultural Studies of Science Education
#44
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,217
of 406,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cultural Studies of Science Education
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.