Title |
Visuo-tactile and topographic characterizations of finished wood surface quality by French consumers and industrials: acceptability thresholds for raised grain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13595-019-0807-1 |
Authors |
Miora F. Ramanakoto, Tahiana Ramananantoandro, Florent Eyma, Bruno Castanié |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Chemistry | 1 | 13% |
Engineering | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,549,698
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#197
of 944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,637
of 366,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.