Title |
A syllabus of (some of) Gingras’ errors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Metascience, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11016-019-00386-1 |
Authors |
Yiftach Fehige, Adam Richter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 60% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,209,129
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Metascience
#47
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,445
of 353,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metascience
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.