| Title |
LAMP: The Lyman Alpha Mapping Project on NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Mission
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-009-9578-6 |
| Authors |
G. Randall Gladstone, S. Alan Stern, Kurt D. Retherford, Ronald K. Black, David C. Slater, Michael W. Davis, Maarten H. Versteeg, Kristian B. Persson, Joel W. Parker, David E. Kaufmann, Anthony F. Egan, Thomas K. Greathouse, Paul D. Feldman, Dana Hurley, Wayne R. Pryor, Amanda R. Hendrix |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 41% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 24% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#930,641
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#40
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,600
of 166,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.