You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Joint association of urinary sodium and potassium excretion with cardiovascular events and mortality: prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.l772 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin O’Donnell, Andrew Mente, Sumathy Rangarajan, Matthew J McQueen, Neil O’Leary, Lu Yin, Xiaoyun Liu, Sumathi Swaminathan, Rasha Khatib, Annika Rosengren, John Ferguson, Andrew Smyth, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Rafael Diaz, Alvaro Avezum, Fernando Lanas, Noorhassim Ismail, Khalid Yusoff, Antonio Dans, Romaina Iqbal, Andrzej Szuba, Noushin Mohammadifard, Atyekin Oguz, Afzal Hussein Yusufali, Khalid F Alhabib, Iolanthe M Kruger, Rita Yusuf, Jephat Chifamba, Karen Yeates, Gilles Dagenais, Andreas Wielgosz, Scott A Lear, Koon Teo, Salim Yusuf, the PURE Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 298 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 40 | 13% |
| United States | 31 | 10% |
| Canada | 20 | 7% |
| Spain | 14 | 5% |
| Australia | 10 | 3% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Chile | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 120 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 209 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 58 | 19% |
| Scientists | 25 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 219. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#179,688
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,530
of 64,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,837
of 366,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#62
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.