↓ Skip to main content

Provider and patient perspectives on barriers to buprenorphine adherence and the acceptability of video directly observed therapy to enhance adherence

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Provider and patient perspectives on barriers to buprenorphine adherence and the acceptability of video directly observed therapy to enhance adherence
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13722-019-0139-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margo E. Godersky, Andrew J. Saxon, Joseph O. Merrill, Jeffrey H. Samet, Jane M. Simoni, Judith I. Tsui

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 20%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Psychology 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,333,528
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#118
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,351
of 364,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.