↓ Skip to main content

Measuring and Assessing Regional Education Inequalities in China under Changing Policy Regimes

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 239)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring and Assessing Regional Education Inequalities in China under Changing Policy Regimes
Published in
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12061-019-09293-8
Authors

Lili Xiang, John Stillwell, Luke Burns, Alison Heppenstall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Unspecified 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 36 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 12%
Unspecified 5 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 42 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,660,187
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
#32
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,237
of 352,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.