You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic implications of genetic copy number variation in epilepsy plus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epilepsia, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/epi.14683 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonietta Coppola, Elena Cellini, Hannah Stamberger, Elmo Saarentaus, Valentina Cetica, Dennis Lal, Tania Djémié, Magdalena Bartnik‐Glaska, Berten Ceulemans, J. Helen Cross, Tine Deconinck, Salvatore De Masi, Thomas Dorn, Renzo Guerrini, Dorotha Hoffman‐Zacharska, Frank Kooy, Lieven Lagae, Nicholas Lench, Johannes R. Lemke, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Francesca Madia, Heather C. Mefford, Deborah Morrogh, Peter Nuernberg, Aarno Palotie, An‐Sofie Schoonjans, Pasquale Striano, Elzbieta Szczepanik, Anna Tostevin, Joris R. Vermeesch, Hilde Van Esch, Wim Van Paesschen, Jonathan J Waters, Sarah Weckhuysen, Federico Zara, Peter De Jonghe, Sanjay M. Sisodiya, Carla Marini, Anna‐Elina Lehesjioki, Dana Craiu, Tiina Talvik, Hande Caglayan, Jose Serratosa, Katalin Sterbova, Rikke S. Møller, Helle Hjalgrim, Holger Lerche, Yvonne Weber, Ingo Helbig, Sarah von Spiczak, Carmen Barba, Anneleen Bogaerts, Antonella Boni, Elisabeth Caruana Galizia, Sara Chiari, Gianpiero Di Gacomo, Annarita Ferrari, Silvia Guarducci, Sabrina Giglio, Philip Holmgren, Costin Leu, Federico Melani, Francesca Novara, Marilena Pantaleo, Elke Peeters, Tiziana Pisano, Anna Rosati, Josemir Sander, Natasha Schoeler, Pawel Stankiewicz, Salvatore Striano, Arvid Suls, Monica Traverso, Geert Vandeweyer, Anke Van Dijck, Orsetta Zuffardi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Finland | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,142,252
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Epilepsia
#2,851
of 5,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,465
of 368,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epilepsia
#34
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.