| Title |
Belowground Biomass Response to Nutrient Enrichment Depends on Light Limitation Across Globally Distributed Grasslands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-019-00350-4 |
| Authors |
Elsa E. Cleland, Eric M. Lind, Nicole M. DeCrappeo, Elizabeth DeLorenze, Rachel Abbott Wilkins, Peter B. Adler, Jonathan D. Bakker, Cynthia S. Brown, Kendi F. Davies, Ellen Esch, Jennifer Firn, Scott Gressard, Daniel S. Gruner, Nicole Hagenah, W. Stanley Harpole, Yann Hautier, Sarah E. Hobbie, Kirsten S. Hofmockel, Kevin Kirkman, Johannes Knops, Christopher W. Kopp, Kimberly J. La Pierre, Andrew MacDougall, Rebecca L. McCulley, Brett A. Melbourne, Joslin L. Moore, Suzanne M. Prober, Charlotte Riggs, Anita C. Risch, Martin Schuetz, Carly Stevens, Peter D. Wragg, Justin Wright, Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric W. Seabloom |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 8 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,637,975
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#212
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,136
of 357,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#6
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.