| Title |
Early Recurrence in Completely Resected IIIB and IIIC Melanoma Warrants Restaging Prior to Adjuvant Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07274-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martine Bloemendal, Wouter W. van Willigen, Kalijn F. Bol, Marye J. Boers-Sonderen, Johannes J. Bonenkamp, J. E. M. Werner, Erik H. J. G. Aarntzen, Rutger H. T. Koornstra, Jan Willem B. de Groot, I. Jolanda M. de Vries, Jacobus J. M. van der Hoeven, Winald R. Gerritsen, Johannes H. W. de Wilt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,344,611
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,049
of 6,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,214
of 356,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#63
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.