You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
DNA repair genes are selectively mutated in diffuse large B cell lymphomas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1084/jem.20122842 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noel FCC de Miranda, Roujun Peng, Konstantinos Georgiou, Chenglin Wu, Elin Falk Sörqvist, Mattias Berglund, Longyun Chen, Zhibo Gao, Kristina Lagerstedt, Susana Lisboa, Fredrik Roos, Tom van Wezel, Manuel R. Teixeira, Richard Rosenquist, Christer Sundström, Gunilla Enblad, Mats Nilsson, Yixin Zeng, David Kipling, Qiang Pan-Hammarström |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#4,088
of 11,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,437
of 209,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#22
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.