You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mutations in kelch-like 3 and cullin 3 cause hypertension and electrolyte abnormalities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature10814 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynn M. Boyden, Murim Choi, Keith A. Choate, Carol J. Nelson-Williams, Anita Farhi, Hakan R. Toka, Irina R. Tikhonova, Robert Bjornson, Shrikant M. Mane, Giacomo Colussi, Marcel Lebel, Richard D. Gordon, Ben A. Semmekrot, Alain Poujol, Matti J. Välimäki, Maria E. De Ferrari, Sami A. Sanjad, Michael Gutkin, Fiona E. Karet, Joseph R. Tucci, Jim R. Stockigt, Kim M. Keppler-Noreuil, Craig C. Porter, Sudhir K. Anand, Margo L. Whiteford, Ira D. Davis, Stephanie B. Dewar, Alberto Bettinelli, Jeffrey J. Fadrowski, Craig W. Belsha, Tracy E. Hunley, Raoul D. Nelson, Howard Trachtman, Trevor R. P. Cole, Maury Pinsk, Detlef Bockenhauer, Mohan Shenoy, Priya Vaidyanathan, John W. Foreman, Majid Rasoulpour, Farook Thameem, Hania Z. Al-Shahrouri, Jai Radhakrishnan, Ali G. Gharavi, Beatrice Goilav, Richard P. Lifton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 29% |
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 285 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 20% |
| Unknown | 46 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,109,130
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#33,476
of 98,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,809
of 252,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#376
of 941 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 941 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.