| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of a classification-based system for sub-acute and chronic low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-011-2144-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adri T. Apeldoorn, Judith E. Bosmans, Raymond W. Ostelo, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Maurits W. van Tulder |
| Abstract |
Identifying relevant subgroups in patients with low back pain (LBP) is considered important to guide physical therapy practice and to improve outcomes. The aim of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modified version of Delitto's classification-based treatment approach compared with usual physical therapy care in patients with sub-acute and chronic LBP with 1 year follow-up. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 166 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 25% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,412,246
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#998
of 4,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,453
of 245,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#13
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,594 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.