You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Severity of White Matter Hyperintensities and Effects on All-Cause Mortality in the Mayo Clinic Florida Familial Cerebrovascular Diseases Registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mayo Clinic Proceedings, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.10.024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tasneem F. Hasan, Kevin M. Barrett, Thomas G. Brott, Mohammed K. Badi, Elizabeth R. Lesser, David O. Hodge, James F. Meschia |
| Abstract |
To compare all-cause mortality rates across the severity range of white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Between October 26, 2010, and October 5, 2017, the ongoing Mayo Clinic Florida Familial Cerebrovascular Diseases Registry prospectively enrolled 1011 diverse participants with and without cerebrovascular disease. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was used to evaluate WMH in 455 participants using the Fazekas scale. Fazekas deep WMH (FD) and periventricular WMH (FPV) scores (0-3 points) were assigned on the basis of WMH severity. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, Cox proportional hazards models, and estimated hazard ratios compared survival rates across FD and FPV categories. The Fisher exact and χ2 tests evaluated the relationship of categorical variables, and the Kruskal-Wallis test measured the relationship of continuous variables across FD and FPV categories. All tests were performed at a P<.05 significance level. Over a median follow-up of 3.06 years (range, 0.00-6.96 years), 96 deaths occurred. Higher FD scores corresponded to a higher likelihood of mortality (P<.001). Participants with an FD score of 3 were 4.69 (95% CI, 2.60-8.46) times more likely to die compared with those with an FD score of 0. Participants with higher FPV scores had a higher likelihood of mortality (P<.001). Participants with an FPV score of 3 were 7.04 (95% CI, 3.39-14.62) times more likely to die compared with those with an FPV score of 0. Once adjusted, age and baseline functional status explained most of the survival differences among the FD scores. Associations between all-cause mortality rates across the severity range of WMH were observed in the Registry. Further studies are warranted to understand the clinical importance of WMH in other clinical populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#4,403
of 5,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,272
of 367,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#87
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.