| Title |
Prevalence of G6PD Viangchan variant in malaria endemic areas in Lao PDR: an implication for malaria elimination by 2030
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-2715-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ken Ing Cherng Ong, Moritoshi Iwagami, Hitomi Araki, Phonepadith Khattignavong, Pheovaly Soundala, Sengdeuane Keomalaphet, Phoyphaylinh Prasayasith, Lavy Lorpachan, Phonepadith Xangsayalath, Tiengkham Pongvongsa, Bouasy Hongvanthong, Paul T. Brey, Shigeyuki Kano, Masamine Jimba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,756,347
of 23,322,258 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,583
of 5,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,727
of 352,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#82
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.