↓ Skip to main content

Intermediate screws or kyphoplasty: Which method of posterior short-segment fixation is better for treating single-level thoracolumbar burst fractures?

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Intermediate screws or kyphoplasty: Which method of posterior short-segment fixation is better for treating single-level thoracolumbar burst fractures?
Published in
European Spine Journal, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5822-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junxin Zhang, Hao Liu, Hui Liu, Angela Carley Chen, Fan He, Feng Zhou, Huilin Yang, Tao Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 43%
Psychology 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,671,706
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,514
of 4,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,790
of 438,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#75
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,696 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.