| Title |
Isochrons and phaseless sets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Biology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01273747 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Guckenheimer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 30% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 23% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 18% |
| Mathematics | 14 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,785,647
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#88
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,316
of 308,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.