Title |
The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2362-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Libing Jiang, Yi Sheng, Xia Feng, Jing Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 17 | 24% |
United States | 7 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
Colombia | 5 | 7% |
Japan | 2 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 59 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 11% |
Scientists | 3 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 16% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Professor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 22% |
Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 48% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,009,843
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#782
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,660
of 365,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#22
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.