↓ Skip to main content

Cell Death Mechanisms and Modulation in Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
230 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cell Death Mechanisms and Modulation in Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bogdan A. Stoica, Alan I. Faden

Abstract

Cell death after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of neurological deficits and mortality. Understanding the mechanisms of delayed post-traumatic cell loss may lead to new therapies that improve outcome. Although TBI induces changes in multiple cell types, mechanisms of neuronal cell death have been the predominant focus. Recent work has emphasized the diversity of neuronal death phenotypes, which have generally been defined by either morphological or molecular changes. This diversity has led to confusing and at times contradictory nomenclature. Here we review the historical basis of proposed definitions of neuronal cell death, with the goal of clarifying critical research questions and implications for therapy in TBI. We believe that both morphological and molecular features must be used to clarify post-traumatic cell death and related therapeutic targets. Further, we underscore that the most effective neuroprotective strategies will need to target multiple pathways to reflect the regional and temporal changes underlying diverse neuronal cell death phenotypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 216 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 18%
Student > Master 32 14%
Researcher 31 14%
Other 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 56 25%
Unknown 31 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 18%
Neuroscience 37 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Engineering 14 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 41 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#734
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,229
of 172,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.