↓ Skip to main content

Improving survival in a large French ALS center cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Improving survival in a large French ALS center cohort
Published in
Journal of Neurology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-011-6403-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul H. Gordon, François Salachas, Gaelle Bruneteau, Pierre-François Pradat, Lucette Lacomblez, Jesus Gonzalez-Bermejo, Capucine Morelot-Panzini, Thomas Similowski, Alexis Elbaz, Vincent Meininger

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine whether survival changed during 2002-2009 at a French amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) center. We included all patients with ALS who were seen consecutively at the center from January 2002-May 2009. Participants were followed from date of first visit through death, date of censoring, or December 31, 2009, whichever occurred first. Cox proportional hazard models computed hazard ratios (HR; 95% confidence interval CI) of death, and flexible modeling of continuous predictors (splines) assessed trends in survival. We analyzed a total of 2,037 ALS patients, of whom 1,471 died before the end of follow-up. Median survival was 2.83 years from onset and 1.65 years from first visit. Compared to patients first seen before 2004, the HR of death was 0.97 (95% CI = 0.85-1.11, p = 0.6721) for patients first seen in 2004-2005, 0.96 (95% CI = 0.83-1.10, p = 0.5125) for 2006-2007, and 0.56 (95% CI = 0.46-0.69, p < 0.0001) after 2007, while adjusting for other survival predictors. Spline analysis confirmed that survival remained stable during 2002-2006, then markedly improved. The proportion of patients receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV) increased from 16 (2004) to 51% (2008). At this large ALS center, survival improved after 2006. Because more aggressive use of NIV was the principal therapeutic adaptation, our data suggest that better survival resulted from improved respiratory care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 6 16%
Other 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,705,818
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,379
of 4,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,617
of 245,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.