↓ Skip to main content

Stakeholders’ Views on Early Diagnosis for Alzheimer’s Disease, Clinical Trial Participation and Amyloid PET Disclosure: A Focus Group Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Stakeholders’ Views on Early Diagnosis for Alzheimer’s Disease, Clinical Trial Participation and Amyloid PET Disclosure: A Focus Group Study
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11673-019-09901-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gwendolien Vanderschaeghe, Rik Vandenberghe, Kris Dierickx

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 32 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 8 10%
Unspecified 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 35 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,701,379
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#121
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,422
of 351,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.