You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Professional autonomy and surveillance: the case of public reporting in cardiac surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sociology of Health & Illness, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.12883 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Exworthy, Jonathan Gabe, Ian R. Jones, Glenn Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,038,434
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#485
of 1,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,768
of 351,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#14
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.